<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Casio G Shock World Time Mens Black Resin #G-7800-1DR</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.casiogshockwatches.net/casio-g-shock-world-time-mens-black-resin-g-7800-1dr/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.casiogshockwatches.net/casio-g-shock-world-time-mens-black-resin-g-7800-1dr/</link>
	<description>Online Store</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Apr 2010 02:01:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: John Doe</title>
		<link>http://www.casiogshockwatches.net/casio-g-shock-world-time-mens-black-resin-g-7800-1dr/#comment-335</link>
		<dc:creator>John Doe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 09:18:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.casiogshockwatches.net/casio-g-shock-world-time-mens-black-resin-g-7800-1dr/#comment-335</guid>
		<description>Review of My new G7800: like a greatly improved 5600!
I just received my G7800 (positive display, black, brushed stainless steel around the face) and I really like it.  The digits are not annoying at all.  I was afraid that the digits would be too &#039;tile like&#039; but they are fine.  They are bold enough to see at a glance.  The time is perfectly placed right in the center of the watch! Can you imagine- a g shock with numbers perfectly placed, and no silliness filling up the screen? No more searching for the actual time amongst distractions! I was able to make the fonts on the day/date year fine, so that the time stands out more. 

The watch has a very nice brushed steel front.  Basically the styling is very similar to the 5600&#039;s.  It is like a 5600, but upgraded and more modernized.  It is a 5600 without as much nerdiness.  It has a classy but tough look to it.  It looks like it will hold up better than the 5600 cosmetically, thanks to the steel! It might be a tad more raised than the 5600.  You really cannot go wrong with this one. 

The watch is not atomic, which, to me, means that it should last longer than 1. 5 years.  I have had 3 atomic casios, and all 3 have died within 1. 5 years.  I wouldn&#039;t have bought it if it were atomic. 

I think that we may have a perfect G shock here, which i didn&#039;t think existed.  The only thing is that the band is a little stiff.  Hopefully it will soften up with time.  I might dip the straps in boiling water to help them along. 

I can tell that I am going to wear this one constantly.  It took over a year, but I am glad that I have finally pulled the trigger.  $75, off of amazon, came in 4 days. 

I could go on about the functions, but why bother? I just use it to tell the time, and to time myself at the gym and on my lunch hour.  World time, timers etc. . 

Really guys- if you have been on the fence on this one- it is well worth pulling the trigger on this one.  It is just a fantastically evolved dw5600.  Maybe that is why they called it the 7800? They have taken the 5600 (which to me has always been a perfect watch) and they have dressed it up.  They have brought the 5600 into this century.  You can&#039;t go wrong here. 

Don&#039;t be turned off by the tile like digits- that effect goes away when you see the watch in person.  It was my biggest concern, but now it is not an issue. 

BUY BUY BUY!
Rating: 5 / 5</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Review of My new G7800: like a greatly improved 5600!<br />
I just received my G7800 (positive display, black, brushed stainless steel around the face) and I really like it.  The digits are not annoying at all.  I was afraid that the digits would be too &#8217;tile like&#8217; but they are fine.  They are bold enough to see at a glance.  The time is perfectly placed right in the center of the watch! Can you imagine- a g shock with numbers perfectly placed, and no silliness filling up the screen? No more searching for the actual time amongst distractions! I was able to make the fonts on the day/date year fine, so that the time stands out more. </p>
<p>The watch has a very nice brushed steel front.  Basically the styling is very similar to the 5600&#8217;s.  It is like a 5600, but upgraded and more modernized.  It is a 5600 without as much nerdiness.  It has a classy but tough look to it.  It looks like it will hold up better than the 5600 cosmetically, thanks to the steel! It might be a tad more raised than the 5600.  You really cannot go wrong with this one. </p>
<p>The watch is not atomic, which, to me, means that it should last longer than 1. 5 years.  I have had 3 atomic casios, and all 3 have died within 1. 5 years.  I wouldn&#8217;t have bought it if it were atomic. </p>
<p>I think that we may have a perfect G shock here, which i didn&#8217;t think existed.  The only thing is that the band is a little stiff.  Hopefully it will soften up with time.  I might dip the straps in boiling water to help them along. </p>
<p>I can tell that I am going to wear this one constantly.  It took over a year, but I am glad that I have finally pulled the trigger.  $75, off of amazon, came in 4 days. </p>
<p>I could go on about the functions, but why bother? I just use it to tell the time, and to time myself at the gym and on my lunch hour.  World time, timers etc. . </p>
<p>Really guys- if you have been on the fence on this one- it is well worth pulling the trigger on this one.  It is just a fantastically evolved dw5600.  Maybe that is why they called it the 7800? They have taken the 5600 (which to me has always been a perfect watch) and they have dressed it up.  They have brought the 5600 into this century.  You can&#8217;t go wrong here. </p>
<p>Don&#8217;t be turned off by the tile like digits- that effect goes away when you see the watch in person.  It was my biggest concern, but now it is not an issue. </p>
<p>BUY BUY BUY!<br />
Rating: 5 / 5</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
